• Second World Day of the Poor

    the poorWe live in a society that is very comfortable talking in terms of human rights and social justice, but we are troubled when the vocabulary shifts to a more combative linguistic register, says Kevin Hargaden.

    Read more

  • Ignatian Examen in Prison

    claire hargadenThe Ignatian Examen is a five-part spiritual exercise which Jesuits do twice daily. It also offers benefits to others, including prisoners. Claire Hargaden reflects on the practice.

    Read more

  • Prisoners' Sunday

    prisoner sunday

    Prisoners' Sunday is an opportunity to pause, reflect and pray for the men, women and children in prison and detention. The following short reflection by Eoin Carroll touches upon some key moments in the prison landscape over the past year.

    Read more

  • Irish Prisoners Overseas

    Irish Prisoners OverseasIrish citizens who are in prison overseas face lengthy delays to have their applications to be transferred home processed. This must change, says Ciara Kirrane of the ICPO.

    Read more

About the Centre

The Jesuit Centre for Faith and Justice works to combat injustice and marginalisation in Irish society, through social analysis, education and advocacy.

The Centre highlights complex social issues, informs opinion and advocates for governmental policy change to create a fair and equitable society for all.

Analysis on our Key Issues

People in prison are amongst the most marginalised and vulnerable in our society. The majority have left school early, experience literacy and learning difficulties and have a history of unemployment... Click here to view all of our material on Penal Policy

Environmental protection has emerged as a key element of social justice debates in recent decades... Click here to view all of our material on Environmental Justice

The right to a safe and secure place to live is one of the most basic human rights, it is fundamental to enable people to live a dignified life... Click here to view all of our material on Housing Policy

In our political discourse, every question of human flourishing seems to be reduced to bottom-line thinking. This focus on riches impoverishes our shared discourse and has serious negative consequences for society Click here to view material on Economic Justice

The Jesuit Centre for Faith and Justice focuses on a number of other issues... Explore all here

Our Journal

wn420

Exploring Social Justice

Why Care - Social Justice Awareness for Younger People

The Emaciated Conversation about Global Poverty

global growth webGlobal poverty is one of those seemingly rare topics where there might be good news to celebrate, says Kevin Hargaden.
 
 
The controversial Harvard psychologist Steven Pinker argues in his bestseller Enlightenment Now that “inequality in the world is declining” (p. 105). In the recently published Goalkeepers' Report on the output of their philanthropic foundation, Bill and Melinda Gates note that the percentage of people living below the extreme poverty line has shrunk from 36% in 1990 to 9% last year (p. 6).
 
The economist Branko Milanovic has recently attained a sort of academic celebrity with his “elephant graph”, a key feature of his excellent 2016 book Global Inequality, which demonstrates that apart from the plutocrat class (who can re-brand themselves as “philanthropists” and publish self-aggrandizing “goalkeeper” reports on the state of global social development), “the great winners” from the last generation of globalisation “have been the Asian poor and middle classes”. It is important to note the corollary: “the great losers, the lower middle classes of the rich world” (p. 20).
 
Each of these analyses, in their place, make a valuable contribution to the conversation about poverty. Yet as different as they are, they all share a common flaw which is of critical importance on this, the International Day for the Eradication of Poverty. Each of them is committed to a particular kind of moral reasoning which we might call “graphtacular”. The argument rests on data-sets and the results can be depicted pictorially, and therefore we can all too easily assume the argument is coherent all the way through. Yet, of the three writers, on Milanovic accounts for the remarkable role played by China in reducing global poverty.
 
The graphs all look healthy, with poverty declining at a satisfying clip and equality rising in certain places at a surprising rate. But we can be fooled into neglecting that the baseline they are using is the radically insufficient figure of US$1.90 a day. This barely is beyond sustenance in even the poorest countries in the world. The person removed from Pinker’s definition of the poor are likely to still be profoundly impoverished. 
 
This matters because increasingly our moral imaginations are shaped by such visual representations. Through seductive infographics, arguments are often assumed and causation inferred without warrant. It makes a world of difference whether inequality is reducing because of free-market globalisation, or because of more effective state-directed governance in places like India and China. The vision of an inclusive world, free of poverty, requires attention to detail. Good news can still be found, and when it is found, it should be celebrated. But the struggle for justice demands a sceptical scrutiny of claims and outcomes that often even those who most laud Enlightenment values fail to deliver.
 

Posted in Poverty & Inequality News

Tags: Theology,

Print Email